Curriculum sequencing & thoughtful retrieval: It’s beginning to pay off

We’ve been working on our Key Stage 3 Geography curriculum for several years now and we are starting to see our efforts begin to pay off with regards to the deliberate sequencing of knowledge. In this short post, I am going to reflect on a single, but significant, moment from my last lesson of the term with a Year 8 class.

During this lesson, in which I was introducing the formation of the Sierra Nevada region in the USA, I included a retrieval task at the start of the lesson based on the image below.

Diagram showing the process of subduction at a destructive plate margin

Students were asked to recall knowledge they had first acquired during Year 7 and had then covered again earlier in Year 8. Following a brief discussion and a little CFU (checking for understanding), I asked students to write an explanation of what was happening. I think it’s important to note that this wasn’t a quiz or list of 10 recall questions. Instead, this retrieval task required students to remember information and write several sentences to explain the sequence of events, not something which is easily done without reasonable knowledge and understanding of the processes involved.

Moving around the class, I was pleased to see the vast majority of students were able to confidently put pen to paper. The usual one-to-one support was needed in some parts of the room, but this was little more than a few prompts, questions or direction of how to start.

To provide students with feedback and ensure they had an opportunity to correct or improve their answers, I walked them through my answer whilst pointing to key features on the diagram. After each statement, I asked students to raise their hands if they had included a similar point, sentence or key term. Met with a sea of arms throughout most of my explanation, I was confident that we could move on to the focus of the current lesson, ‘How did the Sierra Nevada region form?’

The next phase of the lesson involved a full page of challenging text which included these opening paragraphs…

Study suggests parts of the Sierra Nevada formed in a “geologic instant,” more than twice as fast as previously thought.

Although we can’t see it in action, the Earth is constantly churning out new land. This can take place at subduction zones, where tectonic plates move towards each other and in the process create chains of volcanoes as one plate is forced under another. Some of this magma does not spew out, but instead mixes and morphs just below the surface. It then crystallizes as new continental crust, in the form of a mountain range.

Scientists have thought that the Earth’s mountain ranges are formed through this process over many millions of years. But MIT geologists have now found that the planet can generate new land far more quickly than previously thought.

By deliberately including this specific retrieval task at the start of the lesson, the opening passage of text was something the students already understood. Not only did this give them great confidence, but it meant they had an understanding of the vocabulary and, more importantly, an image in their minds of what was happening.

As we continued to read through the text, students had engaged their prior knowledge onto which they could attach new learning. This allowed for more effective learning of new knowledge but also the embedding of their previous understanding of the tectonic processes involved.

So how did we get to this stage?

During Year 7, we have written a unit which introduces tectonics for the first time and focusses on the physical processes occurring within the Earth’s interior. The process of subduction and the reasons why it happens are important. The basic concepts are introduced with regards to plate margins, and examples are shared from around the world Students participate in the drawing and labelling of diagrams, before being able to explain each type of margin.

A year later, in the early parts of Year 8, students revisit these ideas as they explore how ocean basins are created and destroyed. Here, the processes associated with plate movement are applied to the Wilson Cycle. Students once again are expected to use geographical vocabulary to explain processes, this time applying previous learning to a new area of geographical study.

So by the time these processes are brought in for a third time, during my lesson on Friday, most students were confident in their understanding and able to recall explanations with relative ease. At worst, some gentle prompting is required to get students on their way. Not only this, but I was then able to introduce even more complex disciplinary knowledge through a piece of challenging text. This would not have been possible had the relevant background understanding have not been available to students.

As 3pm arrived and the term came to an end, I was left with the pleasant thought that what we are doing is having a positive impact on learning with students now engaging with, and applying, geographical knowledge and understanding at a far higher level than I have experienced previously. I can’t think of a better way to head in to the school holidays!

Reflection

  • Retrieval practice does not have to be a quiz or series of recall questions. Instead, students can focus on one area of prior learning, shared through an appropriate task/format, to activate this for the current lesson.
  • The deliberate sequencing of the curriculum is essential if important ideas and concepts are to be learned, embedded and built upon over time.

How I teach geography…

Having taught geography in the same school for 10 years, the first national lockdown in March 2020 provided an opportunity to reflect on, and refine, many aspects of my teaching practice. In this short article I will outline my approach to teaching geography. Some of these insights have evolved over time, whereas some have developed more recently thanks to the work of others. For example, Oliver Caviglioli and David Rodger-Goodwin’s work on graphic organisers have inspired my teaching practice and helped me to codify my ideas about teaching geography, as shown below. Indeed, I will also include reflections on other approaches which I myself am only trying for the first time. 

I am fortunate to work in a school where curriculum is at the heart of what we do. Departments are given incredible autonomy and over the past two years we have also been given a vast amount of time within our teams to talk openly and honestly about what we should teach. In geography, we agreed upon a cumulative story where students would be taken on a journey of the history of planet earth from its formation through to the Anthropocene. Being able to teach the geography that inspires and excites me has given me the motivation to work on how best to deliver this in the classroom. 

Mary Myatt, Christine Counsell and Mark Enser – to name just a few whose work I have read recently – all refer to ‘powerful knowledge’. Our team see this as teaching our students unashamedly academic and challenging geographical content. This provides them with both a deep and broad understanding of our planet, its people and of the great web of interconnections between the two branches of our discipline. However, to do this well, we must first consider our own subject knowledge. This means I read as much as possible whether this be non-fiction books, news articles or geographical magazines. Twitter is another great tool for signposting excellent resources whilst also allowing teachers to engage with academics, researchers and writers. As a result, I continue to become a better geographer and this means I can think critically about our curriculum and ensure what we deliver is grounded in giving students a broad and deep understanding of the world. 

Excellent subject knowledge enables teachers to bring scholarship to the classroom, as we learnt under the guidance of Tim Jenner when he was Head of Humanities at my school. Taking beautiful texts and rich academic writing directly to the students is proving to be a great way of inspiring young geographers. This is also developing students’ academic vocabulary and written communication (see the work of Alex Quigley for more on this). As I choose to avoid delivering lessons which are restricted to a sequence of PowerPoint slides, I include extended passages of geographical text in lessons. This has opened up a whole new way of sharing knowledge with students. Booklets can also be powerful resource and we have had great success in using Ben Ranson’s excellent work with our Year 7’s this year. I think it is important to note that planning great lessons can sometimes mean creating a selection of brilliant PowerPoint presentations but great lessons can also be delivered without a single slide being shared. 

I mentioned in the introduction that Oliver Caviglioli and David Rodger-Goodwin have influenced me greatly this year but I must also acknowledge Adam Boxer and his work around using mini white boards and a visualiser to deliver explanations. I have only adopted this approach myself since September and again, have found this has had a significant impact on my practice. My explanations are now better paced and more deliberate and I am able to take students through the sequence of learning far more effectively with live modelling and dual coding playing a leading role. For example, I recently delivered explanations of plate margins, global atmospheric circulation and the hydrological cycle in this way. 

Some things have not changed too much in recent years in my classroom but they have proven to work and, pleasingly, have also been promoted by a number of leading figures in our profession. Questioning is the most valuable weapon in my assessment armoury and I find my judgement of any student’s knowledge and understanding evolves from a subconscious review of their verbal answers following many questions over many weeks of lessons. Cold-calling and asking students to share what they have learnt or understood is essential to this process and should be one the most important areas to focus on in our lessons. One of my favourite questions is “Lukastell me what you understand about…” This may be more of a request than a question but either way, this allows me to assess what students are thinking about and their understanding of the topic. This also allows me to control what happens next and whether I can move forward or more input is required.  

Finally, the power of modelling. I think it is common to hear this term and think of it as a ‘model answer’ but modelling is so much more. How we verbalise our ideas and frame explanations, how we demonstrate the links and connections we are constantly making, the vocabulary and key words we choose, and the way in which we present or write down our thoughts all require modelling if students are to get better within our lessons. Coupled with questioning to ensure our students are understanding what we are telling them, modelling helps them to communicate their knowledge effectively. 

Ultimately, questioning and modelling can only be deployed successfully when underpinned with strong subject knowledge. Ensuring I ask the right questions and deliver clear and accurate explanations is incredibly important otherwise the act of including such practice in lessons is frivolous.  

As this article only touches on some of my thoughts, I’ll end with a simple message which is subject knowledge and pedagogy should be seen as two parts of a whole and neither should be explored in isolation. This is how I teach powerful geography

Top 5 tips… 

  1. Continue to develop your subject knowledge by reading a range of materials and following the experts. 
  1. Release yourself from the shackles of PowerPoint – not everything needs to be shared on a slide. 
  1. Incorporate scholarship into lessons through rich academic texts and challenging vocabulary. 
  1. Consider how your explanation may be enhanced by using a visualiser and dual coding techniques. 
  1. Incorporate questioning and modelling into everything, all of the time but ensure it is underpinned by sound knowledge and understanding of the topic. 

The Sun at the centre of the curriculum

The Sun’s gravitational force holds the solar system together whilst also providing light and heat. Without light and heat, there would be no life on Earth. The Sun is very important. There are also a number of other very important features within the solar system – planets, dwarf planets, moons, asteroids, comets, and meteors but it is the Sun, in the centre, that holds everything in place.

What has this got to do with curriculum?

Let us imagine the curriculum to be similar to the model of the solar system. Just as the Sun is at the centre of the solar system, subject knowledge is at the heart of the curriculum. It is our knowledge of the subject that underpins everything we do and it is knowledge that holds everything else in place.

Delivering an effective explanation, asking excellent questions or implementing rigorous assessments are all essential to delivering a strong curriculum yet none of these, or the other key areas of our practice, are as effective if they are not firmly rooted in a deep and broad knowledge of the subject.

More and more teachers are now basing their practice on educational research and many schools have adopted this approach when creating teaching and learning policies but we must pause and remember that this is not necessarily enough in itself. We need to stop and ask ourselves what makes an explanation effective? What makes a question excellent? What makes an assessment rigorous? Of course pedagogy needs careful consideration, and we must all continue to develop this, but underneath it all is the subject knowledge of an expert.

So throwing a retrieval quiz into the start of a lesson because this is seen as good practice isn’t actually good enough unless those questions are based on content that has been carefully selected. Retrieval also needs to be delivered in such as way as to develop students’ understanding and assist them in generating meaning. If we are not careful, we are simply enforcing that remembering a collection of facts is enough when this isn’t how you become a great geographer, for example.

Likewise, the teacher who asks most of the students in the room a question through cold calling is seen as doing something good. Again though, these questions must be designed not simply to check what has been remembered over the last 5 minutes but must help students understand what this information means and how it is part of the bigger picture.

With this in mind, we need to see more teachers spending their time reading and discussing their subject. In fact, we need schools to allow teachers to to spend more time reading and discussing their subject. Rather than using planning time and meetings to complete arbitrary tasks, how amazing would it be to sit together sharing thoughts on a recent publication or wrestling with each other about the content to be selected for the next unit in Year 8?

Everything we do is important but remember, the Sun is at the centre of the solar system.